Rev 37571 – offer circular: the month unit was swallowing the EMI scheme ...

amit — Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:34:19 +0530

amit – 2 file(s) modified
offer circular: the month unit was swallowing the EMI scheme marker

'M' is the month UNIT, not a separator, but the token loop flushed on it. '3m,6m LCE'
tokenises to 3, M, 6, M, LCE - each M banked its month as NONE, so the LCE arrived
with nothing pending and was silently lost.

74 Sep'26 offers carry a scheme in the tenure cell that never reached offer_tenure;
22 of them through this path ('3m,6m LCE', '6m,9m LCE', '3m & 6m LCE', '3m, 6m, 9m,
12m, 18m, 24m LCE'). The rest are bare 'CIB' cells with no months at all, which is a
separate case and left alone.

It also fixes '3M (NCE), 6M & Above LCE', where the M flushed BOTH groups before
either marker was seen - so an offer that is no-cost on 3 months and low-cost beyond
recorded neither.

This is money: no-cost EMI costs the customer nothing and low-cost does not, so a lost
marker is a term a partner could quote wrongly at the counter.

Months with no marker anywhere still bank as NONE via the end-of-cell flush - the same
answer the M branch used to give for a genuinely unmarked cell.

New TenureParserTest, 6 cases, covering the regression and the shapes that must not
change.

~ /trunk/profitmandi-fofo/src/main/java/com/spice/profitmandi/web/offercircular/TenureParser.java
+ /trunk/profitmandi-fofo/src/test/java/com/spice/profitmandi/web/offercircular/TenureParserTest.java

SmartDukaan – /trunk/profitmandi-fofo/src/test/java/com/spice/profitmandi/web/offercircular/TenureParserTest.java

Rev 37571 – offer circular: the month unit was swallowing the EMI scheme ...