Subversion Repositories SmartDukaan

Last modification

• Rev 37550 – 30 d 12 h
• Author: amit

• Log message:

  web offer: partner-facing titles, and stop calling a scheme offer a cashback offer
  
  web_offer.title is partner-facing - StoreController and DealsController map it into
  the product's offer list - so it now leads with the value rather than a filing label:
  
  Up to Rs.4,000 cashback
  Rs.1,500 cashback on Credit Card EMI
  10% cashback up to Rs.7,500 on Credit Card EMI
  No Cost EMI on 3, 6 months
  
  Month and brand are gone: the card already shows the product, and the offer carries
  its own dates. The full breakdown sits in detailedText below it.
  
  This fixes a live defect. 16 published offers have no cashback at all, and the old
  template rendered them 'SEPTEMBER 2026 XIAOMI Cashback Offer- NA' with detail 'NA',
  on 81 SKUs. They are EMI-scheme offers and now say so.
  
  Scheme inference at ingest: Motorola states the scheme in the DESCRIPTION rather than
  the tenure cell - '[3&6 M]' plus 'Only NCEMI', where every other OEM writes
  '6(NCE),9,12(LCE)'. TenureParser is right to return NONE for such a cell; the scheme
  is simply not in it. Recovered in CircularIngestService where both columns are in
  hand, and deliberately narrow: only when EVERY tenure came back without a scheme AND
  the description names exactly one. On Sep'26 that is 10 offers, all Motorola; the
  other 23 scheme-less rows are cashback offers whose descriptions are amounts, and
  inventing a scheme for those would misstate the terms.
  
  This distinction is money: four of the Motorola rows are LOW cost EMI, and calling
  them no-cost would promise a partner something the bank will not honour.
  
  'No cashback.' is dropped everywhere - the absence of an amount says it, and beside a
  Cashback Instant Benefit scheme it flatly contradicted the name.
  
  Tests 8 -> 12.