| Line 258... |
Line 258... |
| 258 |
*
|
258 |
*
|
| 259 |
* Aim to close about half the gap: the piece travels roughly ASSUMED_RATIO px per
|
259 |
* Aim to close about half the gap: the piece travels roughly ASSUMED_RATIO px per
|
| 260 |
* slider px, so nudge ~= gap / (2 * ratio), clamped. The real ratio is still derived
|
260 |
* slider px, so nudge ~= gap / (2 * ratio), clamped. The real ratio is still derived
|
| 261 |
* from the measurement; this only sizes the probe.
|
261 |
* from the measurement; this only sizes the probe.
|
| 262 |
*/
|
262 |
*/
|
| - |
|
263 |
/*
|
| - |
|
264 |
* REALME's tuning values, deliberately independent of oppo's -- do not sync the two.
|
| - |
|
265 |
* Realme currently converts ~60% of completed drags against oppo's ~12% on the same
|
| - |
|
266 |
* widget, so it is the one that must not be disturbed to chase oppo.
|
| - |
|
267 |
*
|
| - |
|
268 |
* Left at 1.7 on purpose. Realme's measured ratio over 1,683 production calibrations
|
| - |
|
269 |
* is 0.70, so this is wrong here too and the probe is smaller than intended -- but it
|
| - |
|
270 |
* is wrong while converting 60%, and oppo is carrying the corrected value first. If
|
| - |
|
271 |
* oppo improves, bring 0.70 over here and measure it on its own.
|
| - |
|
272 |
*/
|
| 263 |
private static final double ASSUMED_RATIO = 1.7;
|
273 |
private static final double ASSUMED_RATIO = 1.7;
|
| 264 |
private static final int MIN_NUDGE = 10;
|
274 |
private static final int MIN_NUDGE = 10;
|
| 265 |
private static final int MAX_NUDGE = 60;
|
275 |
private static final int MAX_NUDGE = 60;
|
| 266 |
private static final double ALIGNED_PX = 2.0;
|
276 |
private static final double ALIGNED_PX = 2.0;
|
| 267 |
|
277 |
|